T: Nature ID: 717 I: 2523 P: 17.77 C: 0.0008

Solitary bees appear to be important pollinators of native crinklemat plants. Selection of @MIZAUCV

 BeesDecember 2016 Utah State University. Utah State University entomologist Zach Portman studies a diverse group of solitary, desert bees that aren't major pollinators of agricultural crops, but fill an important role in natural ecosystems of the American Southwest, including the sizzling sand dunes of California's Death Valley.

With Terry Griswold of the USDA-ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit at Utah State and John Neff of the Central Texas Melittological Institute in Austin, Portman reports nine, newly identified species of the genus Perdita in the December 23, 2016, issue of Zootaxa. His research was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship awarded in 2011 and a Desert Legacy Grant from the Community Foundation.

Unexpected finds include the curious ant-like males of two of the species, which are completely different in appearance from their mates.

"It's unclear why these males have this unique form, but it could indicate they spend a lot of time in the nest," Portman says. "We may find more information as we learn more about their nesting biology."


T: Nature ID: 716 I: 2784 P: 19.61 C: 0.0007

Impact of climate change on microbial biodiversity Recommendation by @MIZAUCV

 ClimateDecember 2016. From University of Helsinki. The results are just published in the journal Nature Communications.

We still know fairly little about the specific impacts of climate change and human activity, such as nutrient enrichment of waterways, on broad geographical scales. Researchers from the Department of Geosciences and Geography at the University of Helsinki, the Finnish Environment Institute, and the Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences have studied hundreds of microcosms in mountainous regions with the aid of natural temperature gradients in the studied areas, while modifying the enrichment level in field tests.

The results indicate that the bacteria in elevated tropical areas are similar to e.g. those in arctic areas. As a result of changes in temperature and aquatic enrichment, significant alterations occur in the microcosms, and as the enrichment increases, biodiversity reduces, says Associate Professor Janne Soininen.


T: Nature ID: 666 I: 3166 P: 20.04 C: 0.0006

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

First Flower Grown in Space Station's Veggie Facility

 HAPPENED IN 2016On Jan. 16, 2016, Expedition 46 Commander Scott Kelly shared photographs of a blooming zinnia flower in the Veggie plant growth system aboard the International Space Station. Kelly wrote, "Yes, there are other life forms in space! #SpaceFlower #YearInSpace"

This flowering crop experiment began on Nov. 16, 2015, when NASA astronaut Kjell Lindgren activated the Veggie system and its rooting "pillows" containing zinnia seeds. The challenging process of growing the zinnias provided an exceptional opportunity for scientists back on Earth to better understand how plants grow in microgravity, and for astronauts to practice doing what they’ll be tasked with on a deep space mission: autonomous gardening. In late December, Kelly found that the plants "weren't looking too good," and told the ground team, “You know, I think if we’re going to Mars, and we were growing stuff, we would be responsible for deciding when the stuff needed water. Kind of like in my backyard, I look at it and say ‘Oh, maybe I should water the grass today.’ I think this is how this should be handled.”

The Veggie team on Earth created what was dubbed “The Zinnia Care Guide for the On-Orbit Gardener,” and gave basic guidelines for care while putting judgment capabilities into the hands of the astronaut who had the plants right in front of him. Rather than pages and pages of detailed procedures that most science operations follow, the care guide was a one-page, streamlined resource to support Kelly as an autonomous gardener. Soon, the flowers were on the rebound, and on Jan. 12, pictures showed the first peeks of petals beginning to sprout on a few buds.

Image Credit: NASA


T: Nature ID: 674 I: 3178 P: 20.11 C: 0.0006

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

A new view of the tree of life

 HAPPENED IN 2016Abstract
The tree of life is one of the most important organizing principles in biology1. Gene surveys suggest the existence of an enormous number of branches2, but even an approximation of the full scale of the tree has remained elusive. Recent depictions of the tree of life have focused either on the nature of deep evolutionary relationships3,​4,​5 or on the known, well-classified diversity of life with an emphasis on eukaryotes6. These approaches overlook the dramatic change in our understanding of life's diversity resulting from genomic sampling of previously unexamined environments. New methods to generate genome sequences illuminate the identity of organisms and their metabolic capacities, placing them in community and ecosystem contexts7,8. Here, we use new genomic data from over 1,000 uncultivated and little known organisms, together with published sequences, to infer a dramatically expanded version of the tree of life, with Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya included. The depiction is both a global overview and a snapshot of the diversity within each major lineage. The results reveal the dominance of bacterial diversification and underline the importance of organisms lacking isolated representatives, with substantial evolution concentrated in a major radiation of such organisms. This tree highlights major lineages currently underrepresented in biogeochemical models and identifies radiations that are probably important for future evolutionary analyses.

Early approaches to describe the tree of life distinguished organisms based on their physical characteristics and metabolic features. Molecular methods dramatically broadened the diversity that could be included in the tree because they circumvented the need for direct observation and experimentation by relying on sequenced genes as markers for lineages. Gene surveys, typically using the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene, provided a remarkable and novel view of the biological world1,9,10, but questions about the structure and extent of diversity remain. Organisms from novel lineages have eluded surveys, because many are invisible to these methods due to sequence divergence relative to the primers commonly used for gene amplification7,11. Furthermore, unusual sequences, including those with unexpected insertions, may be discarded as artefacts7.

Whole genome reconstruction was first accomplished in 1995 (ref. 12), with a near-exponential increase in the number of draft genomes reported each subsequent year. There are 30,437 genomes from all three domains of life—Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya—which are currently available in the Joint Genome Institute's Integrated Microbial Genomes database (accessed 24 September 2015). Contributing to this expansion in genome numbers are single cell genomics13 and metagenomics studies. Metagenomics is a shotgun sequencing-based method in which DNA isolated directly from the environment is sequenced, and the reconstructed genome fragments are assigned to draft genomes14. New bioinformatics methods yield complete and near-complete genome sequences, without a reliance on cultivation or reference genomes7,15. These genome- (rather than gene) based approaches provide information about metabolic potential and a variety of phylogenetically informative sequences that can be used to classify organisms16. Here, we have constructed a tree of life by making use of genomes from public databases and 1,011 newly reconstructed genomes that we recovered from a variety of environments (see Methods).

To render this tree of life, we aligned and concatenated a set of 16 ribosomal protein sequences from each organism. This approach yields a higher-resolution tree than is obtained from a single gene, such as the widely used 16S rRNA gene16. The use of ribosomal proteins avoids artefacts that would arise from phylogenies constructed using genes with unrelated functions and subject to different evolutionary processes. Another important advantage of the chosen ribosomal proteins is that they tend to be syntenic and co-located in a small genomic region in Bacteria and Archaea, reducing binning errors that could substantially perturb the geometry of the tree. Included in this tree is one representative per genus for all genera for which high-quality draft and complete genomes exist (3,083 organisms in total).

Despite the methodological challenges, we have included representatives of all three domains of life. Our primary focus relates to the status of Bacteria and Archaea, as these organisms have been most difficult to profile using macroscopic approaches, and substantial progress has been made recently with acquisition of new genome sequences7,8,13. The placement of Eukarya relative to Bacteria and Archaea is controversial1,4,5,17,18. Eukaryotes are believed to be evolutionary chimaeras that arose via endosymbiotic fusion, probably involving bacterial and archaeal cells19. Here, we do not attempt to confidently resolve the placement of the Eukarya. We position them using sequences of a subset of their nuclear-encoded ribosomal proteins, an approach that classifies them based on the inheritance of their information systems as opposed to lipid or other cellular structures5.

Figure 1 presents a new view of the tree of life. This is one of a relatively small number of three-domain trees constructed from molecular information so far, and the first comprehensive tree to be published since the development of genome-resolved metagenomics. We highlight all major lineages with genomic representation, most of which are phylum-level branches (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for full bootstrap support values). However, we separately identify the Classes of the Proteobacteria, because the phylum is not monophyletic (for example, the Deltaproteobacteria branch away from the other Proteobacteria, as previously reported2,20).


T: Nature ID: 667 I: 3235 P: 20.47 C: 0.0006

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

Will the Zika virus prompt Latin America to rethink abortion and birth control?

 HAPPENED IN 2016The Zika virus outbreak and its probable association with microcephaly in newborns are prompting calls to loosen Latin America's strict abortion laws and make birth control more readily available.

Abortion is fully criminalized in six countries in the region. In El Salvador, for instance, women who have abortions can face prison. In many other countries, including Brazil and Colombia, abortion is permitted only in cases of rape, incest or fetal impairment.
As Zika raises anxieties about babies born with significant medical problems, some physicians and reproductive health advocates think the virus should create another legal exception for abortion.
Even though abortion is outlawed in much of Latin America, women still seek it out at legal and physical risk. In fact, 13 percent of maternal deaths (the fourth highest cause) in the region can be attributed to unsafe abortions.
Concern about Zika could lead to real change for reproductive health for millions of women in the region. But this can happen only if the expansion of abortion and contraception is based on human rights and reproductive health equity, not driven primarily by fears of defective babies.
Abortion is restricted in most of Latin America
Abortion is fully criminalized, with no exceptions, in El Salvador, Chile, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Nicaragua and Suriname. In El Salvador, 30 to 40 women are serving prison sentences for seeking abortions.
In many other countries, including Argentina, Costa Rica, Bolivia, Brazil and Colombia, abortion is permitted under certain circumstances.
In Brazil, for instance, abortion has been allowed since 1940 in instances of rape or endangerment to the woman. Women who seek abortions outside these exceptions and the physicians who perform the procedure can be imprisoned.


T: Nature ID: 638 I: 3829 P: 22.93 C: 0.0005

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

History of Ecological Sciences, Ecological Aspects of Entomology During the 1800s

 EntomologystAn extensive literature on the history of entomology (see Literature Guide below) provides the basis for a discussion of aspects of ecologically relevant entomology for the 1800s, with two topics deferred to later parts of this history: diseases of insects and insects as vectors of human disease, to part 46 on parasitism and the germ theory of disease; and pollination ecology and domestic bees, to part 52 on symbiosis.
We saw in parts 21 and 30 (Egerton 2006, 2008) that there were many important studies on insects during the 1700s, and in parts 33 and 41 (Egerton 2009b, 2012a) we met notable entomologists of the 1800s: Thomas Say (1787–1834) and Henry Walter Bates (1825–1892). Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913), discussed in parts 41–42 (Egerton 2012a, b), also notably contributed to entomology. Charles Darwin (1809–1882) had collected beetles at Cambridge and insects on the voyage of the Beagle; he discussed insects in the Origin of Species, and he studied insects in relation to pollination and insectivorous plants (Riley 1882, Egerton 2010, 2011b, Carton 2011). Some of these men might themselves be classified as “stamp collectors,” but taxonomy and systematics were especially important for entomology if it were ever to become a sophisticated science, because it was essential for zoologists to distinguish whatever species they studied so others could verify or refute claims made about particular species.


T: Nature ID: 595 I: 4122 P: 23.69 C: 0.0005

Visit @MIZA to knowThe family Chrysomelidae, commonly known as leaf beetles.

 InsectsThe family Chrysomelidae, commonly known as leaf beetles include in excess of 35,000 species in over 2,500 genera, making it one of the largest families of beetles.

This site presents the collection of Chrysomelidae at the Museo del Instituto de Zoología Agrícola, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Central de Venezuela. The vast majority of specimens of this collection were collected in travel in Central and South America by the Bechyné's or received in exchange.


T: Nature ID: 633 I: 4196 P: 25.13 C: 0.0005

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

Se le invita a participar en la Iniciativa para el @MIZAUCV. Entérese abriendo el enlace.

 Iniciativa-MIZAMIZA, Necesidad esencial para PROTEGER nuestro patrimonio en el que se representan nuestras colecciones y los equipos necesarios para continuar con nuestro trabajo de investigación.

Se requiere:
Reparación cable de fibra óptica.

Tipo solicitud: Urgente.
Modalidad: Donación.

T: Nature ID: 608 I: 4440 P: 25.81 C: 0.0005

Conociendo la rica biodiversidad de Venezuela. Memphis basilia basilia "Mariposa hoja"@MIZAUCV

 InsectosDIAGNOSIS.- Size: 76-80mm. A large species showing a pronounced sexual dimorphism. Although very close in facies to related species, it can be distinguished by a series of comparative characters: Memphis alberta (Druce) - - forewing apex less falcate; Memphis iphis (Latreille) — different underside pattern of the wings; Memphis moeris (Felder) — forewing apex slightly less falcate, wings slightly thinner, ground color of the upperside basal area in males darker blue (same as in M. alberta) without the greenish sheen, and in females, deeper sky blue, subapical blue patches better marked, basal blue (in male) not reaching the tornus incurvation. Additionally, male genital structure allows the recognition of this species.


T: Nature ID: 596 I: 4543 P: 26.11 C: 0.0004

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

Conozca las Odonata de Venezuela presentado por @MIZAUCV


Bienvenidos a Odonata de Venezuela

Números de taxa de Odonata Venezolanos (última revisión13 de Abril de 2016):


Familias: 4
Géneros: 67
Especies: 292
Subespecies: 8

Familias: 9
Géneros: 57
Especies: 235
Subespecies: 6


T: Nature ID: 590 I: 4734 P: 27.05 C: 0.0004

Contribuir al conocimiento de la fauna venezolana y de otras áreas del Neotrópico @MIZAUCV apoyemos a la UCV

 MuseosEI Museo del Instituto de Zoología Agrícola “Francisco Fernández Yépez” (MIZA), es una institución dedicada al estudio de la biodiversidad tropical. Tenemos la convicción de que el conocimiento de nuestro patrimonio biológico está íntimamente relacionado con su preservación y uso sostenible, es por ello que la educación ambiental es una herramienta vital para formar ciudadanos conscientes y protectores de nuestro patrimonio biológico.

Hay que visitarlo

Avenida 19 de Abril/ Avenida Casanova Godoy, entrada Campus UCV, Maracay


T: Nature ID: 642 I: 4834 P: 29.12 C: 0.0004

   Twitter Google Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr StumbleUpon Reddit Pinterest

Se le invita a participar en la Iniciativa para el @MIZAUCV. Entérese abriendo el enlace. 4

 Iniciativa-MIZAMIZA, Necesidad esencial para PROTEGER nuestro patrimonio en el que se representan nuestras colecciones y los equipos necesarios para continuar con nuestro trabajo de investigación.

Se requiere:
50 mts de cable concéntrico, 4 hilos, No 10, necesarios para instalación lámparas externas

Tipo solicitud: Urgente.
Modalidad: Donación.



Teléfonos: +58 212 578 1145
Fax: +58 212 576 3892